Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 057
Original file (2012 057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2012-057

 

Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.6, ART 12.B.18, JKK,
Misconduct, RE4

Honorable
None

None

 

TIS 3 yrs, 2 months, 6 days
Policy Implications | None

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged in late 2003 with an Under Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct

stemming from Involvement with Drugs (positive urinalysis). Thereafter, the command initiated action
pursuant to policy to discharge the applicant.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant offered no new evidence on their
behalf to refute the findings of the discharge.

Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for

individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The Coast Guard has zero tolerance
for drug abuse. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 010

    Original file (2014 010.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 008

    Original file (2013 008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to involvement with drugs. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 046

    Original file (2014 046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 047

    Original file (2014 047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board endorses an administrative change to amend the Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on the issuance of ALCOAST 562/08. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General Discharge, with an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 004

    Original file (2014 004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with drugs in 2011. The applicant admitted to the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) in the Fall of 2010 to using marijuana on different occasions. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 016

    Original file (2013 016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable. The appropriate character of service is “Under Honorable Conditions,” therefore the Board recommends an administrative change to the applicant’s record to reflect “Under Honorable Conditions.” Propriety: Discharge was proper.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 075

    Original file (2012 075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Prior to the applicant’s drug use in 2011, ALCOAST 605/10 was in place to specifically list Spice as an illegal drug, and usage of said substance would result in a Discharge from the service. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 027

    Original file (2014 027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant he was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 081

    Original file (2012 081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 011

    Original file (2014 011.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.